Correct Tech Solutions Ltd designs, integrates, governs, and operates light-industrial, API-driven display systems. We do not manufacture hardware. We work with display vendors and system integrators to deliver end-to-end solutions. This page explains how we work with display vendors, how we support system integrators, and the distinction between subcontractor and lead roles.
Working with Display Vendors
We do not sell display hardware. We specify requirements: environmental ratings, connectivity, power, lifecycle, and compatibility with our integration and governance stack. We work with display vendors to ensure that hardware choices match operational requirements. That may mean evaluating connectivity options (network, serial, API), power and environmental suitability, and support for remote management (MDM, configuration). We do not endorse or name specific vendors on this site; we describe the capability: we work with vendors to align hardware with integration and governance needs.
When we specify hardware, we focus on the interface between hardware and our integration layer: how does the display receive content or configuration? How do we monitor status? How do we roll back? The vendor owns the hardware; we own (or co-own) the integration and application layer. Clear boundaries avoid overlap and confusion.
Supporting System Integrators
System integrators deploy and maintain display systems on site: mounting, cabling, power, network, and sometimes first-line support. We support integrators by providing: integration design and implementation (APIs, data flow, failure behaviour), application logic (content, scheduling, conditional visibility), and governance (access, deploy, rollback, audit). The integrator may handle physical deployment and hardware support; we handle the data pipeline and display application. The split depends on the project; we define it clearly in scope and responsibility.
We provide documentation, runbooks, and training so that integrators can deploy and support the system. We do not leave integration as a black box; we document contracts, failure behaviour, and escalation paths so that support is effective.
Subcontractor vs Lead Roles
We can act as a subcontractor: a client or prime contractor engages us to design and implement the integration and application layer; we deliver against a defined scope and hand over to the prime or client for deployment and operation. We can also act as the lead: we own the end-to-end design, engage display vendors and system integrators as needed, and deliver the full system to the client. The role is defined at the outset so that responsibility and communication are clear.
In both roles, we maintain the same standards: integration-first design, defined failure behaviour, and governance. The difference is who we report to and who owns the client relationship. We are comfortable in either role and specify it clearly in contracts and project plans.
Why this matters in real deployments
Unclear boundaries between vendor, integrator, and integration partner lead to gaps and blame. Clear roles, documented interfaces, and defined responsibility make delivery and support predictable.